ISSN 2084–1418
The paper edition of the Anthropology of History Yearbook is the definitive version
2014, No. 2 (7), History and Gender
Zbigniew Szmyt
Between deification and symbolic violence: on the ambivalent practices lamas performed on the body of the Russian president
![](http://rah.pth.net.pl/images/pdf-icon.png)
PDF version
Keywords: Buryatia, Buddhism, post-socialism, political anthropology
Abstract: In 2009, during the visit of President Dmitry Medvedev in Buryatia, Buddhist authorities proclaimed him an emanation of White Tara - female enlightened energy. Enthronement of the President of the tantric goddess was an attempt at restitution relationship ‘patron-teacher’ formed in the thirteenth century between the rulers of the Mongol Yuan Dynasty and Tibetan lamas of the Sakya linage and sometimes used by Buryats in relation to the Russian tsars. Both the local community and the Russian public opinion received this event ambiguously. For some it was an act of total submission of the central government, the other sacrilegious bordering on the absurd. In my opinion, it was one of the episodes of the practice of taming the ruler by subaltern communities. This paper presents the interpretation that enters an event in a number of practices to tame and manipulate Russian hegemony. My argument is that the ambiguity of many social practices is not only a manifestation of cultural pluralism in Buryatia. Rather, it is a strategy of the weak, which allows keeping agency in a situation of enormous disproportion of forces.
About Author:
SZMYT ZBIGNIEW – ethnologist, Assistant Professor in the Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology of the Adam Mickiewicz University.
References
Аюшеев Д. Мы поддерживаем наших братьев – тибетских буддистов. розг. пров. А. Махачкеев. „МК в Бурятии”. data dostępu: 26.03.2008.
Андросов B. 2000. Буддизм Нагарджурны: Религиозно-философские трактаты. Moskwa.
Atwood Ch. 2004. Encyclopedia of Mongolia and the Mongol Empire. Bloomington.
Bareja-Starzyńska A., Havnevik H. 2009. A Preliminary Study of Buddhism in Present-Day Mongolia. W Mongols. From Countryside to City. Mongols From Country to City. Floating Boundaries, Pastoralism and City Life in the Mongol Lands, red. O. Bruun, Li Narangoa. Kopenhaga.
Belyaeva V. 2009. Szamani i Lamowie w sercu Sajanów. Współczesny system wierzeniowy Buriatów Doliny Tunkijskiej. Wrocław–Poznań.
Charleux I. 2002. "Padmasambhava’s Travel to the North: The Pilgrimage to the Monastery of the Caves and the Old Schools of Tibetan Buddhism in Mongolia". Central Asiatic Journal 46 (2).
Ермаков Д., Медведев стал Белой Тарой. http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2009/08/24_kz_3239833.shtml, data dostępu: 24.08.2009.
Кайбогаров A. Буддисты: Осознав себя Белой Тарой, Медведев может стать лучше. розг. пров. В. Акимов. http: //www.nr2.ru/moskow/246677.html, data dostępu: 27.08.2009.
Khatanbaatar N. 2011. Erdene-Zuu monastery and Its Role to the History. W The international Conference on ‘Erdene-Zuu: Past, Present and Future, red. T. Matsukava, A. Ochir, D. Purevjav. Ułan Bator.
Kawaguchi E. 1995. Three Years in Tibet. Delhi.
Mróz L. 2004. Przebudzenie etniczne. W Etnos przebudzony, red. L. Mróz. Warszawa.
Nowicka E., Wyszyński R. 1996. Lamowie i sekretarze. Poziomy więzi społecznej we współczesnej Buriacji. Warszawa.
Powers J. 2007. Introduction to Tibetan Buddhism. Ithaca – Nowy Jork.
Slezkine Y. 1993. Savage Siberians or Unorthodox Russians? The Missionary Dilemma in Siberia. W Between Heaven and Hell: The Myth of Siberia in Russian Culture, red. G. Diment, Y. Slezkine. Nowy Jork.
Скрынникова T. 1988. Ламаистская церковь и государство. Внешняя Монголия. ХVI — начало ХХ века. Ułan Ude.
Скрынникова T. 2003. Традиционная культура и буддизм в самоидентификации бурят. W Религия и идентичность России, red. М.Т. Степанянц. Moskwa.
Шаглахаев Д. 2003. Прошлое и настоящие Хойморского Дацана, Ułan Ude.
Turner V. 1977. Frame, Flow and Reflection: Ritual and Drama as Public Liminality. W Performance in postmodern culture, red. M. Benamou, Ch. Caramello. Wisconsin–Milwaukee.